<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The STRAIGHT Poop &#187; Project Size</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thestraightpoop.org/tag/project-size/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thestraightpoop.org</link>
	<description>Straight Answers to Real Questions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 19:39:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Dirtier Than Coal?</title>
		<link>http://www.thestraightpoop.org/2010/07/27/dirtier-than-coal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thestraightpoop.org/2010/07/27/dirtier-than-coal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 14:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Terry Walmsley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Air Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opposition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Project Size]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulatory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thestraightpoop.org/?p=480</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the arguments that is heard over and over from opponents of Fibrowatt’s biomass power plants is that these plants are “dirtier than coal.” I’m intrigued as to why they make such a comparison, or for that matter, why people seem to buy this argument, as it’s hard to understand how you can compare<p class="alignCenter"><a class="moreLink" href="http://www.thestraightpoop.org/2010/07/27/dirtier-than-coal/">Read the full post ... </a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thestraightpoop.org/2010/07/27/dirtier-than-coal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Much Electricity would a Fibrowatt Plant Provide?</title>
		<link>http://www.thestraightpoop.org/2010/03/22/how-much-electricity-would-a-fibrowatt-plant-provide/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thestraightpoop.org/2010/03/22/how-much-electricity-would-a-fibrowatt-plant-provide/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 20:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Terry Walmsley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Q-and-A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manure Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Power Purchase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Project Size]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thestraightpoop.org/?p=273</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fibrowatt’s approach to “Power from Poultry Litter” is to develop a project properly sized to meet the need of the poultry industry in a particular poultry-growing region. To provide this alternative litter management solution, we also must be mindful of economic criteria – therefore a plant is sized according to somewhat opposing factors. The primary<p class="alignCenter"><a class="moreLink" href="http://www.thestraightpoop.org/2010/03/22/how-much-electricity-would-a-fibrowatt-plant-provide/">Read the full post ... </a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thestraightpoop.org/2010/03/22/how-much-electricity-would-a-fibrowatt-plant-provide/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

