<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The STRAIGHT Poop &#187; Air Emissions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thestraightpoop.org/tag/air-emissions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thestraightpoop.org</link>
	<description>Straight Answers to Real Questions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 19:39:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Recovering Water from Flue Gas Improves Plant Energy Efficiency</title>
		<link>http://www.thestraightpoop.org/2011/05/26/recovering-water-from-flue-gas-improves-plant-energy-efficiency/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thestraightpoop.org/2011/05/26/recovering-water-from-flue-gas-improves-plant-energy-efficiency/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 15:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Air Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Water]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thestraightpoop.org/?p=519</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you have ever seen a stack (i.e. chimney) for a boiler &#8211; say at a power plant or at an industrial facility &#8211; you may have seen a plume like this: Many people assume that this is smoke but it actually is a steam plume. How do you know? Look at the photo: there is<p class="alignCenter"><a class="moreLink" href="http://www.thestraightpoop.org/2011/05/26/recovering-water-from-flue-gas-improves-plant-energy-efficiency/">Read the full post ... </a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thestraightpoop.org/2011/05/26/recovering-water-from-flue-gas-improves-plant-energy-efficiency/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Harvesting Water from Fuel – A Zero Water Supply Approach for New Biomass Power Plants</title>
		<link>http://www.thestraightpoop.org/2011/05/23/harvesting-water-from-fuel-zero-water-supply-approach-for-new-biomass-power-plants/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thestraightpoop.org/2011/05/23/harvesting-water-from-fuel-zero-water-supply-approach-for-new-biomass-power-plants/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 14:06:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Terry Walmsley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Air Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Water]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thestraightpoop.org/?p=511</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently, Fibrowatt announced the development of a new technology (pdf) that significantly improves the performance of biomass renewable energy plants. One of the important characteristics of this new system is the extent that air emissions can be reduced in conjunction with substantial improvements in energy efficiency. Basically &#8211; these new plants will produce more electricity<p class="alignCenter"><a class="moreLink" href="http://www.thestraightpoop.org/2011/05/23/harvesting-water-from-fuel-zero-water-supply-approach-for-new-biomass-power-plants/">Read the full post ... </a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thestraightpoop.org/2011/05/23/harvesting-water-from-fuel-zero-water-supply-approach-for-new-biomass-power-plants/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dirtier Than Coal?</title>
		<link>http://www.thestraightpoop.org/2010/07/27/dirtier-than-coal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thestraightpoop.org/2010/07/27/dirtier-than-coal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 14:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Terry Walmsley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Air Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opposition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Project Size]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulatory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thestraightpoop.org/?p=480</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the arguments that is heard over and over from opponents of Fibrowatt’s biomass power plants is that these plants are “dirtier than coal.” I’m intrigued as to why they make such a comparison, or for that matter, why people seem to buy this argument, as it’s hard to understand how you can compare<p class="alignCenter"><a class="moreLink" href="http://www.thestraightpoop.org/2010/07/27/dirtier-than-coal/">Read the full post ... </a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thestraightpoop.org/2010/07/27/dirtier-than-coal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Competition for Poultry Litter?</title>
		<link>http://www.thestraightpoop.org/2010/06/03/competition-for-poultry-litter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thestraightpoop.org/2010/06/03/competition-for-poultry-litter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 17:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Terry Walmsley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[North Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Air Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manure Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Odor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thestraightpoop.org/?p=416</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you ever watched the Fox television show “Are you Smarter than a 5th Grader?&#8221; you will know that a fifth grader is pretty smart these days. Further evidence of this is an article today in the Raleigh News &#038; Observer about a fifth grader from Pinehurst, NC. Apparently fifth grader Nick Kuzma entered his<p class="alignCenter"><a class="moreLink" href="http://www.thestraightpoop.org/2010/06/03/competition-for-poultry-litter/">Read the full post ... </a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thestraightpoop.org/2010/06/03/competition-for-poultry-litter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FibroHills Project Update &#8211; BREDL Technical Report – Credible Source?</title>
		<link>http://www.thestraightpoop.org/2010/04/27/fibrohills-update-bredl-technical-report-not-a-credible-source/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thestraightpoop.org/2010/04/27/fibrohills-update-bredl-technical-report-not-a-credible-source/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 19:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Terry Walmsley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[North Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Air Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BREDL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FibroHills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opposition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Permitting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thestraightpoop.org/?p=381</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While this is an issue that dates back to this time last year, I think it is important to again revisit a report released in opposition to the proposed FibroHills plant in Surry County. On May 6, 2009, Blue Ridge Environmental Defense League (BREDL) released a study that was said to show results which demonstrate<p class="alignCenter"><a class="moreLink" href="http://www.thestraightpoop.org/2010/04/27/fibrohills-update-bredl-technical-report-not-a-credible-source/">Read the full post ... </a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thestraightpoop.org/2010/04/27/fibrohills-update-bredl-technical-report-not-a-credible-source/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

