<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The STRAIGHT Poop</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thestraightpoop.org/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thestraightpoop.org</link>
	<description>Straight Answers to Real Questions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 19:39:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Recovering Water from Flue Gas Improves Plant Energy Efficiency</title>
		<link>http://www.thestraightpoop.org/2011/05/26/recovering-water-from-flue-gas-improves-plant-energy-efficiency/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thestraightpoop.org/2011/05/26/recovering-water-from-flue-gas-improves-plant-energy-efficiency/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 15:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Air Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Water]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thestraightpoop.org/?p=519</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you have ever seen a stack (i.e. chimney) for a boiler &#8211; say at a power plant or at an industrial facility &#8211; you may have seen a plume like this: Many people assume that this is smoke but it actually is a steam plume. How do you know? Look at the photo: there is<p class="alignCenter"><a class="moreLink" href="http://www.thestraightpoop.org/2011/05/26/recovering-water-from-flue-gas-improves-plant-energy-efficiency/">Read the full post ... </a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thestraightpoop.org/2011/05/26/recovering-water-from-flue-gas-improves-plant-energy-efficiency/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Harvesting Water from Fuel – A Zero Water Supply Approach for New Biomass Power Plants</title>
		<link>http://www.thestraightpoop.org/2011/05/23/harvesting-water-from-fuel-zero-water-supply-approach-for-new-biomass-power-plants/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thestraightpoop.org/2011/05/23/harvesting-water-from-fuel-zero-water-supply-approach-for-new-biomass-power-plants/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 14:06:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Terry Walmsley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Air Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Water]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thestraightpoop.org/?p=511</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently, Fibrowatt announced the development of a new technology (pdf) that significantly improves the performance of biomass renewable energy plants. One of the important characteristics of this new system is the extent that air emissions can be reduced in conjunction with substantial improvements in energy efficiency. Basically &#8211; these new plants will produce more electricity<p class="alignCenter"><a class="moreLink" href="http://www.thestraightpoop.org/2011/05/23/harvesting-water-from-fuel-zero-water-supply-approach-for-new-biomass-power-plants/">Read the full post ... </a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thestraightpoop.org/2011/05/23/harvesting-water-from-fuel-zero-water-supply-approach-for-new-biomass-power-plants/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>From Georgia Came Questions – From Minnesota Came Answers</title>
		<link>http://www.thestraightpoop.org/2010/08/10/from-georgia-came-questions-%e2%80%93-from-minnesota-came-answers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thestraightpoop.org/2010/08/10/from-georgia-came-questions-%e2%80%93-from-minnesota-came-answers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 00:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Terry Walmsley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Community Support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Outreach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Siting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thestraightpoop.org/?p=497</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As was indicated in a blog post yesterday, Fibrowatt undertook siting evaluations in Georgia so that it would be able to move forward in a timely fashion with power purchase agreement discussions. During this site evaluation process, as often happens with projects of this size and visibility, the public began to ask questions and form<p class="alignCenter"><a class="moreLink" href="http://www.thestraightpoop.org/2010/08/10/from-georgia-came-questions-%e2%80%93-from-minnesota-came-answers/">Read the full post ... </a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thestraightpoop.org/2010/08/10/from-georgia-came-questions-%e2%80%93-from-minnesota-came-answers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Suspension of Development Efforts in Georgia</title>
		<link>http://www.thestraightpoop.org/2010/08/09/suspension-of-development-efforts-in-georgia/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thestraightpoop.org/2010/08/09/suspension-of-development-efforts-in-georgia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 13:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Terry Walmsley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Power Purchase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Siting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thestraightpoop.org/?p=495</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fibrowatt is an independent power producer (IPP) and therefore is largely reliant on securing a long-term power purchase agreement (PPA) with utilities before major development activities can take place. Unlike these regulated utilities, which can incrementally seek ratepayer relief for increased costs, an IPP must rely on the financial strength and contractual protection of a<p class="alignCenter"><a class="moreLink" href="http://www.thestraightpoop.org/2010/08/09/suspension-of-development-efforts-in-georgia/">Read the full post ... </a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thestraightpoop.org/2010/08/09/suspension-of-development-efforts-in-georgia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dirtier Than Coal?</title>
		<link>http://www.thestraightpoop.org/2010/07/27/dirtier-than-coal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thestraightpoop.org/2010/07/27/dirtier-than-coal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 14:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Terry Walmsley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Air Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opposition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Project Size]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulatory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thestraightpoop.org/?p=480</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the arguments that is heard over and over from opponents of Fibrowatt’s biomass power plants is that these plants are “dirtier than coal.” I’m intrigued as to why they make such a comparison, or for that matter, why people seem to buy this argument, as it’s hard to understand how you can compare<p class="alignCenter"><a class="moreLink" href="http://www.thestraightpoop.org/2010/07/27/dirtier-than-coal/">Read the full post ... </a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thestraightpoop.org/2010/07/27/dirtier-than-coal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

